2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,191 cc (3 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Lupo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Lupo. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Lupo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 170 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Lupo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Lupo (140 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Lupo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volkswagen |
Model | Colt | Lupo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1191 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 19.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.5 L/100km | 3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 34 L |