2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2000 Plymouth Prowler
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Plymouth Prowler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Plymouth Prowler would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Plymouth Prowler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 150 kg more than 2000 Plymouth Prowler.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Plymouth Prowler (610 Nm) has 395 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 2000 Plymouth Prowler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2000 Plymouth Prowler | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Plymouth |
| Model | Outlander | Prowler |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2343 cc | 3507 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 162 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 610 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 81 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
