2004 Mitsubishi Outlander vs. 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora should accelerate faster than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 170 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora (353 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (215 Nm). This means 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Oldsmobile |
Model | Outlander | Aurora |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2343 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 162 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 353 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |