2004 Nissan Armada vs. 1989 Toyota Model F
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Model F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Model F would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1989 Toyota Model F. (79 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1989 Toyota Model F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 974 kg more than 1989 Toyota Model F. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Toyota Model F. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Toyota Model F.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Nissan Armada | 1989 Toyota Model F | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Model F |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5556 cc | 1812 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 305 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2240 mm |
