2004 Nissan Armada vs. 2006 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (444 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 564 kg more than 2006 Aston Martin DB9.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm). This means 2006 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Armada | 2006 Aston Martin DB9 | |
Make | Nissan | Aston Martin |
Model | Armada | DB9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 444 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 522 Nm | 570 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2274 kg | 1710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5260 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 16.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 85 L |