2004 Nissan Murano vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Murano. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Murano would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Murano. (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Murano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 25 kg more than 2004 Nissan Murano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (328 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Murano | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
Model | Murano | CTS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Crossover | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3507 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 245 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 302 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.7 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1796 kg | 1821 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |