2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs. 2010 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2010 Honda Odyssey is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Odyssey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Odyssey (244 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (165 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Odyssey weights approximately 580 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Odyssey (325 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara. (220 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Odyssey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara | 2010 Honda Odyssey | |
Make | Suzuki | Honda |
Model | Grand Vitara | Odyssey |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 325 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 5133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1748 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3000 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 79 L |