2004 Toyota Tundra vs. 2013 Mazda CX-05
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-05 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-05. (153 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-05. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 225 kg more than 2013 Mazda CX-05. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Mazda CX-05 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Toyota Tundra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-05 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-05. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-05.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Toyota Tundra | 2013 Mazda CX-05 | |
| Make | Toyota | Mazda |
| Model | Tundra | CX-05 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3376 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5530 mm | 4555 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2165 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3270 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.9 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 58 L |
