2005 BMW FW 27 vs. 1996 Buick Park Avenue
To start off, 2005 BMW FW 27 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Buick Park Avenue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Buick Park Avenue would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Park Avenue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Buick Park Avenue weights approximately 1160 kg more than 2005 BMW FW 27.
Because 2005 BMW FW 27 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW FW 27. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Park Avenue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW FW 27 | 1996 Buick Park Avenue | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | FW 27 | Park Avenue |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 2998 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 960 mm | 1470 mm |