2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2009 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Colorado would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Falcon weights approximately 33 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (391 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chevrolet Colorado 2009 Ford Falcon
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Colorado Falcon
Year Released 2005 2009
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2769 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 175 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 391 Nm
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 92.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 102 mm 99.3 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 10.3:1
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1671 kg 1704 kg
Vehicle Length 5270 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1660 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 3210 mm 2838 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.7 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 13 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 9.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 68 L