2005 Chevrolet Equinox vs. 1973 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda 110 S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 753 kg more than 1973 Mazda 110 S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (285 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | 1973 Mazda 110 S | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Equinox | 110 S |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3425 cc | 1962 cc |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1713 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2360 mm |
