2005 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Renault 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Matiz should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Renault 9 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Matiz | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Matiz | 9 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 780 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 38 L |