2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1963 DAF 600
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 4,155 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1523 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1963 DAF 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | TrailBlazer | 600 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4155 cc | 590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 45 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 65 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2153 kg | 630 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2060 mm |