2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 64 kg more than 2013 Volvo C70.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C70. (236 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | 300 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
