2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (150 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1976 Datsun 280Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1272 kg more than 1976 Datsun 280Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Datsun 280Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Dodge | Datsun |
| Model | Ram | 280Z |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 8276 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 494 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 691 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 60 L |
