2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1986 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Suzuki Swift. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Suzuki Swift would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (331 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1986 Suzuki Swift. (102 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1986 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 2114 kg more than 1986 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Suzuki Swift. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1986 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Ram | Swift |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 108 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2864 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 3680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2250 mm |