2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1063 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (181 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |