2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 BMW M6
To start off, 2013 BMW M6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M6 (552 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 453 kg more than 2013 BMW M6.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW M6 (678 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2013 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2013 BMW M6 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | E-150 | M6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 552 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 678 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0 :1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4903 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2106 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1374 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2851 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |