2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2009 Ford F-150
To start off, 2009 Ford F-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-150 (245 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford F-150. (294 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 2009 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-250 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 294 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 98 L |