2005 Ford Ranger vs. 2003 Proton 300
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 173 kg more than 2003 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 2003 Proton 300 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Ranger | 300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1035 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2450 mm |