2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2005 GMC Canyon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK would be higher. At 2,770 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (167 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 132 kg more than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (252 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK. (245 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Canyon | CLK |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1797 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |