2005 GMC Canyon vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Canyon (220 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2005 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Canyon (305 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Canyon | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Canyon | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3458 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 57 L |