2005 GMC Yukon vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Yukon weights approximately 868 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Yukon (510 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Yukon | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | GMC | Toyota |
Model | Yukon | Condor |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2436 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 195 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2514 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 70 L |