2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 41 kg more than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL (460 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cherokee | SL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 4966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 460 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 1905 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |