2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Plymouth Reliant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | Jeep | Plymouth |
| Model | Wrangler | Reliant |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2260 mm |
