2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1999 Acura TL
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Acura TL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Acura TL. (294 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1999 Acura TL | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | Wrangler | TL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 294 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |