2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2001 Nissan HyperMini
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan HyperMini would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Because 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan HyperMini. (130 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan HyperMini.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2001 Nissan HyperMini | |
Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
Model | Range Rover | HyperMini |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 2988 cc |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 2670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 76 L |