2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1959 Saab 95. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1959 Saab 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1959 Saab 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (244 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Saab 95. (82 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Saab 95.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1959 Saab 95 | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | 6 | 95 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 82 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 910 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |