2005 Mazda Marathon vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2005 Mazda Marathon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda Marathon (104 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda Marathon should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda Marathon weights approximately 652 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mazda Marathon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda Marathon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda Marathon (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda Marathon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Marathon | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | Marathon | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1488 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1517 kg | 865 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2420 mm |