2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2012 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Saab 03-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2012 Saab 03-Sep. (180 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2012 Saab 03-Sep.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (211 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda RX-8 | 2012 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | RX-8 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 216 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 58 L |