2005 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 115 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (222 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda RX-8 | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
Make | Mazda | Lamborghini |
Model | RX-8 | Gallardo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 540 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4345 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1165 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.2 L/100km | 18.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 90 L |