2005 Mazda Tribute vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (367 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER weights approximately 409 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (542 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (207 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda Tribute | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Mazda | Dodge |
Model | Tribute | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 367 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 542 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1443 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1449 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 72 L |