2005 Mercury Mountaineer vs. 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 4,013 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (210 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 730 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier. (183 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mercury Mountaineer | 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
Make | Mercury | Chevrolet |
Model | Mountaineer | Cavalier |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4013 cc | 2190 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 344 Nm | 183 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1917 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 56 L |