2005 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2011 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2011 Toyota Highlander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Highlander (280 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 540 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Toyota Highlander is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Highlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | 2011 Toyota Highlander | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | Highlander |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2972 cc | 3500 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 280 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 2160 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2970 mm | 2789 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 65 L |
