2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2009 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Hardbody | Clio |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |
