2005 Nissan Hardbody vs. 2012 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 2,663 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (122 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Hardbody weights approximately 282 kg more than 2012 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda CR-Z. (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Hardbody | 2012 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Hardbody | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2663 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1213 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2436 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 40 L |