2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 325 kg more than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Because 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Matrix. (170 Nm). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Toyota Matrix | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
Make | Toyota | Lamborghini |
Model | Matrix | Gallardo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 540 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4345 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1184 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.5 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.8 L/100km | 20.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |