2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1958 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP) has 351 more horse power than 1958 Wartburg 312. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 438 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Wartburg 312. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Cadillac CTS | 1958 Wartburg 312 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Wartburg |
| Model | CTS | 312 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 992 cc |
| Horse Power | 400 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 98 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2460 mm |
