2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 356 more horse power than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Daihatsu Taft.
Because 1981 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (64 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1981 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Cadillac | Daihatsu |
Model | CTS | Taft |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 958 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 64 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2030 mm |