2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Mercury Capri
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mercury Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mercury Capri would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Capri. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Capri.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Capri, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mercury Capri. (130 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mercury Capri.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Mercury Capri | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | CTS | Capri |
Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |