2006 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Audi A4
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Audi A4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Audi A4 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 2004 Audi A4. (169 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Audi A4.
Because 2004 Audi A4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi A4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Audi A4. (225 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Audi A4.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac CTS | 2004 Audi A4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | CTS | A4 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1781 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 66 L |