2006 Cadillac STS-V vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac STS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac STS-V would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.

Because 2006 Cadillac STS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac STS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (584 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac STS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2006 Cadillac STS-V has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Cadillac STS-V 2009 Mazda 3
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model STS-V 3
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4376 cc 1998 cc
Horse Power 440 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 584 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1480 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2960 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 10.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]