2006 Dodge Charger vs. 2001 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi SUW would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 305 more horse power than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (120 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Charger | 2001 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Charger | SUW |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6063 cc | 1097 cc |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 71 L |
