2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2002 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2006 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2002 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Ford | Smart |
Model | E-150 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 22 L |