2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 838 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 672 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford E-150 | 2010 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Ford | Koenigsegg |
| Model | E-150 | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 22 L/100km |
