2006 Ford E-150 vs. 2012 BMW 640
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 640 (318 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2006 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 640 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 640 (450 Nm @ 1300 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 640 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford E-150 | 2012 BMW 640 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | E-150 | 640 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4604 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 89.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5007 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1894 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1392 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2968 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 70 L |