2006 Ford F-250 vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford F-250 | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F-250 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4198 cc | 1242 cc |
| Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 6250 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2060 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2040 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2310 mm |
