2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1964 Trabant Universal
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1964 Trabant Universal. (23 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Trabant Universal.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Trabant Universal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Trabant Universal. (51 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Trabant Universal.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Ford Ranger | 1964 Trabant Universal | |
Make | Ford | Trabant |
Model | Ranger | Universal |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4016 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 206 HP | 23 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 51 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 100.4 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.4 mm | 73 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 24 L |