2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1974 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1974 Holden Belmont. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Holden Belmont. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Holden Belmont. (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1974 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Ranger | Belmont |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4016 cc | 3298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 206 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 324 Nm | 263 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |
