2006 Ford Ranger vs. 1993 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1993 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1993 Ford Tempo.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1993 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Ford Tempo. (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Ford Ranger | 1993 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Ranger | Tempo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2299 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 93.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2540 mm |
